Skip to content

Risk, Decisions, Governance

Portfolio Targets

How portfolio leaders define strategic alignment criteria and score every project against them in GreenVee.

A Portfolio Target is a strategic positive criterion defined at the portfolio level. Where Portfolio Risk Factors ask “how exposed is this project to bad outcomes?”, Portfolio Targets ask “how well does this project contribute to our strategic goals?”

Examples: “Carbon reduction contribution,” “Customer satisfaction impact,” “Innovation score,” “Revenue growth alignment.”

Portfolio Targets and Portfolio Risk Factors use the same model. The key difference is orientation — Targets are about upside and strategic alignment; Risk Factors are about downside and strategic exposure.

Field What it means
Title Name of the strategic criterion (e.g. “Carbon reduction contribution”)
Description Explanation of what this target measures and how projects should be evaluated against it
Evaluation Weight Relative importance of this target in the overall portfolio scoring
Active Whether this target is currently in use

Portfolio Targets belong to a Portfolio. Like Risk Factors, they are set by portfolio leadership and represent the strategic goals the portfolio is designed to advance.

A Target Score is one project’s assessment against one Portfolio Target. For each active project, someone rates how well the project contributes to the target.

Field What it means
Answer The project’s score or rating on this target
Assessed Date Date the assessment was made

Each Target Score belongs to both a project and a Portfolio Target.

Together, Portfolio Risk Factors and Portfolio Targets give a balanced view of every project:

Portfolio Risk Factor Portfolio Target
Orientation Downside / threat Upside / opportunity
Question it answers How risky is this project? How strategically valuable is this project?
Schema risk_contribution / risk_contribution_assessment portfolio_target / target_assessment
Set by Portfolio leadership Portfolio leadership
Scored per project? Yes Yes

A project with a low risk profile but also low strategic contribution may be less valuable than a riskier project with high strategic alignment. Having both scoreboards side by side lets leadership make better prioritisation decisions.